Publication
By:
Troy J. Bouffard, Ekaterina Uryupova, Klaus Dodds, Valdimir E. Romanovsky, Alec P. Bennett, Dmitry Streletskiy
Outlet:
Land Date:
June 03, 2021
Download
Troy J. Bouffard, Ekaterina Uryupova, Klaus Dodds, Valdimir E. Romanovsky, Alec P. Bennett, Dmitry Streletskiy
Outlet:
Land Date:
June 03, 2021
Download
While the world continues to work toward an understanding and projections of climate
change impacts, the Arctic increasingly becomes a critical component as a bellwether
region. Scientific cooperation is a well-supported narrative and theme in general,
but in reality, presents many challenges and counter-productive difficulties. Moreover,
data sharing specifically represents one of the more critical cooperation requirements,
as part of the “scientific method [which] allows for verification of results and extending
research from prior results”. One of the important pieces of the climate change puzzle
is permafrost. In general, observational data on permafrost characteristics are limited.
Currently, most permafrost data remain fragmented and restricted to national authorities,
including scientific institutes. The preponderance of permafrost data is not available
openly—important datasets reside in various government or university labs, where they
remain largely unknown or where access restrictions prevent effective use. Although
highly authoritative, separate data efforts involving creation and management result
in a very incomplete picture of the state of permafrost as well as what to possibly
anticipate. While nations maintain excellent individual permafrost research programs,
a lack of shared research—especially data—significantly reduces effectiveness of understanding
permafrost overall. Different nations resource and employ various approaches to studying
permafrost, including the growing complexity of scientific modeling. Some are more
effective than others and some achieve different purposes than others. Whereas it
is not possible for a nation to effectively conduct the variety of modeling and research
needed to comprehensively understand impacts to permafrost, a global community can.
In some ways, separate scientific communities are not necessarily concerned about
sharing data—their work is secured. However, decision and policy makers, especially
on the international stage, struggle to understand how best to anticipate and prepare
for changes, and thus support for scientific recommendations during policy development.
To date, there is a lack of research exploring the need to share circumpolar permafrost
data.
This article explores the global data systems on permafrost, which remain sporadic, rarely updated, and with almost nothing about the subsea permafrost publicly available. The authors suggest that the global permafrost monitoring system should be real time (within technical and reasonable possibility), often updated and with open access to the data (general way of representing data required). Additionally, it will require robust co-ordination in terms of accessibility, funding, and protocols to avoid either duplication and/or information sharing. Following a brief background, this article will offer three supporting themes, (1) the current state of permafrost data, (2) rationale and methods to share data, and (3) implications for global and national interests.
This article explores the global data systems on permafrost, which remain sporadic, rarely updated, and with almost nothing about the subsea permafrost publicly available. The authors suggest that the global permafrost monitoring system should be real time (within technical and reasonable possibility), often updated and with open access to the data (general way of representing data required). Additionally, it will require robust co-ordination in terms of accessibility, funding, and protocols to avoid either duplication and/or information sharing. Following a brief background, this article will offer three supporting themes, (1) the current state of permafrost data, (2) rationale and methods to share data, and (3) implications for global and national interests.