Award Negotiation, Acceptance & Setup
Wait...It's Not MY Grant? - Open Mike NIH Blog by Dr. Michael Lauer
Award Negotiation/Just in Time Information
Signature Authority and Agreement Negotiation: OGCA is the only UAF office authorized to accept research grants, contracts, and other related agreements on behalf of the University of Alaska Fairbanks. Documents requiring signatures must be reviewed and signed by an authorized representative located in OGCA. DO NOT SIGN any documents, or communicate any financial or institutional commitments unless it has been reviewed and approved by OGCA.
Before an award can be accepted by the University of Alaska Fairbanks, OGCA completes a comprehensive review of the award, including the terms and conditions. OGCA is responsible for conducting all negotiations with sponsors to obtain mutually-acceptable language which will allow UAF to accept the award.
Every negotiation is handled by the OGCA Management Team and, depending on the nature of the terms to be negotiated, may require input and assistance from other offices such as the Office of Intellectual Property and Commercialization, the Office of General Counsel, Office of Research Integrity, etc. While OGCA works diligently to resolve all negotiations in a timely manner, we cannot guarantee a timeframe for completion of negotiations.
OGCA reserves the right to require changes based on specifics of a review, sponsor requirements, and/or changes to institutional policy.
Examples of the most common terms and conditions that require negotiation include:
- Provisions that prohibit publication of the results of the project
- Provisions that require us to assign copyright
- Provisions that do not allow UAF to own the data from the project
- Provisions that deal with indemnity for the project
- Provisions that deal with confidentiality
- Provisions that are inconsistent with UAF policies
- Provisions that are inconsistent with government regulations
- Awards that include non-standard patent and/or licensing terms
- Awards that fail to include all elements agreed upon prior to the award
Just in Time/Supporting Proposal Information: Sponsor request for additional information after proposal submission. After a proposal has been submitted a sponsor may contact the PI or OGCA to submit supporting proposal information such as IRB/IACUC approvals, current and pending support, completion of sponsor specific forms, etc. PI should forward all sponsor requests to OGCA and OGCA will work with PI to respond to sponsor request.
- Any time a sponsor requests or requires a change in the originally proposed budget or scope of work, the Principal Investigator should always notify and coordinate a response through the OGCA before submitting a revised budget or scope of work to the sponsor.
Awards in Hand: On occasion, sponsors begin negotiations by providing a draft agreement, award letter, or a check directly to UAF. In order to obtain University approval “after the fact”, PI should work with OGCA.
Our Role in the Post Award Process
To assist the Principal Investigator (PI) and department in achieving the Statement of Work of the sponsored project, while maintaining sufficient fiscal controls to ensure compliance with:
- Terms and conditions of the award, as well as state, local, and federal regulations
- Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
- University Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual (UAPPM)
- OGCA receives an award and issues a notification to PI and unit via email.
FRABUDP Keying Process and Checklist
Modifications / Revisions
- FRABUDP Keying Checklist (department initiated)
- FRABUDP Keying Checklist (OGCA initiated)
- Keying Checklist Examples
Awards Directly to Unit:
At times awards may go directly to units. The FRABUDP checklist should be used and routed to OGCA when completed.
Awards Directly to OGCA:
If awards are sent directly to OGCA from sponsors, OGCA will initiate a FRABUDP keying checklist to the unit for processing. The unit will complete FRABUDP Keying Checklist and route to OGCA.
Harmonization is a service OGCA offers to address the complexity of awards and funding to UAF. Harmonization involves a face-to face meeting with various stakeholders from the central offices and a unit/department. Harmonization includes a review of everything from the proposal to the Notice of Award. The Harmonization process is a communication strategy that has reduced the administrative burden by identifying and minimizing risks associated with managing extramural funds. Harmonization also provides an incentive for collaboration that aligns with OGCA’s mission and vision for creating a culture of accountability, responsibility, and transparency.