Sophocles' Oedipus Rex Dramaturge

Oedipus Rex logo

Character: The Tragic Flaw

In his Poetics, Aristotle writes of the good man "whose misfortune is brought about not by vice or depravity, but by some error or frailty. He must be one who is highly renowned and prosperous-a personage like Oedipus, Thyestes or other illustrious men of such families."

He continues to elaborate that "the change of fortune should be... from good to bad... and come about as the result...of some frailty."

In the last century, some scholars have come to doubt this theory of "the tragic flaw." Sophocles went out of his way to present Oedipus as an extremely capable, beloved administrator. "The playwright never suggests that Oedipus has brought his destiny on himself by any 'ungodly pride' [hubris] or 'tragic flaw' [hamartia]."

Other scholars, including Bernard Knox, write that not one trait of Oedipus is designated a tragic flaw, but the actions that produce Oedipus' catastrophe stem from all sides of his character, of the total man. And the total man, as Aristotle wrote, is more good than bad.

Knox is supported by Charles Segal. In the confrontational scene of Tiresias and Oedipus, both men lose their tempers and their shouting just goes past each other. "Rather than providing a basis for a tragic flaw, this scene is the play's most dramatic enactment to this point of the tragedy of knowledge: truth is trapped in illusion and in the disturbances of language and emotion."

The difference is in their beliefs: Tiresias looks toward the gods whom he serves, the king toward reason and the human motives that he can understand. In a somewhat irreverent but intelligent analysis of Oedipus, Daniels and Scully in their book, What Really Goes On in Sophocles' Theban Plays assert that Oedipus does not ask six significant questions that have clung to him before the plague arrived in Thebes.

They are:

  1. Where did the scars on my ankles come from?
  2. Who are my real parents?
  3. How can I best avoid killing my father and marrying my mother?
  4. Is this old man who forced me off the road and rudely swatted me from his carriage my father?
  5. Who killed the king whose throne I have just been given?
  6. Is this widow I am about to marry my mother?"

The more we learn as the plot unfolds, the more it becomes clear that Oedipus' one intellectual success, solving the riddle of the Sphinx, was a fluke. In Daniels and Scully's opinion Oedipus has a mistaken pride in his investigative skills, loves the limelight, and has a huge ego that thirsts for acclaim. In addition, he is extremely defensive when he perceives a threat to himself or his reputation. In summary: "Oedipus is an unintelligent macho posturer."